Preemption & Grassroots Movement Building

“All public health is local -it’s got to start and be sustained at the local level.”

Howard Koh, Assistant Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Preemption occurs when the state or federal government eliminates or limits the power of a lower level of government.  Express preemption occurs when legislation or regulations contain preemptive language, often in the form of a “preemption clause.”  Implied preemption occurs when a court finds that a law is preemptive even in the absence of a preemption clause.  Unless a federal or state law has a non-preemption (or “savings”) clause, there is no guarantee that it won’t preempt stronger state or local laws.

Preemption and local control are nearly universal issues across health and public health policy, from alcohol sales to nutrition to fire prevention.  Preemption, once passed, is very difficult to repeal.  To make fully informed decisions about preemptive proposals, the public health community should consider all of preemption’s short-term and long-term consequences, including its impact on grassroots movement building.

Grassroots Movement Building

A grassroots public health movement is guided by and derives its strength from individual, engaged citizens. Grassroots movements can empower the public health field to pursue fundamental policy change.  Even if they are at first unsuccessful, grassroots movements can increase awareness of a health issue, build community readiness for policy change, and lead to healthier social norms.

Local control of health and public health has numerous benefits that are lost when local power is preempted.  Local control provides for accountability and innovation because local legislators interact with their constituents and can craft laws addressing the needs of their own communities, allowing diverse communities to adopt protections for themselves rather than a one-size-fits-all, top-down standard.  As advocates for tobacco control have learned, more intensive and meaningful public education can happen at the community level during a local campaign than during a state or national campaign.

Allowed to grow, grassroots movements and the public dialogue they engender can spark a chain reaction of policy education, innovation, and social norms change.  But by taking away local (or state) control, preemption removes a major reason grassroots movements form in the first place. Thus, preemption can have unforeseen, long-term consequences for the public’s health.

Blog

  • Risk of Preemption in the Smoke-Free Housing Movement

    Over the last few years, the movement to promote smoke-free policies for multi-unit housing has been extremely successful.  Thousands of privately own apartment buildings have voluntarily implemented policies prohibiting or significantly restricting smoking in common areas, individual units, on patios and balconies and on the entire property.  Public housing authorities…

  • IOM Takes the Lead on Preemption

    The Institute of Medicine has addressed federal and state preemption in a new report on law and policy in public health. Among the most authoritative, and unbiased, voices in public health, the IOM has concluded that federal and state preemption should be avoided “unless there are compelling reasons to the…

  • Preempting a movement for childhood obesity prevention

    Taking a well-worn page from the playbook of the Tobacco Industry, the fast food industry is quietly, and so far successfully, eliminating local control over nutrition policy. In March, the Arizona legislature passed a preemption bill written by the Arizona Restaurant Association.  The new law, which goes into effect in July, takes away the authority…

  • Preemption threatens grassroots fire prevention movement

    About 3000 Americans die in home fires every year and thousands more are injured. Home fires are the greatest cause of fire deaths and injuries, and children under five and older adults face the highest risk. One of the great public health success stories of the past decade is the grassroots movement for…

  • Preemption should be the exception, not the rule

    There’s been bad news on the federal preemption front recently, but there’s some good news, too. Last month, the Administrative Conference of the United States published a Recommendation for the first time in fifteen years—about preemption in federal rulemaking. The Recommendation explains a Clinton-era Executive Order (that builds upon a…

News

  • Regulating Guns in New Orleans: An Op-Ed

    Louisiana is one of 42 states…that prohibits any political subdivision from passing an ordinance or regulation concerning the sale, purchase, or ownership of guns that’s more restrictive than state law.

  • Cleveland files in court to keep its ban on trans fats

    Jackson was joined…by council members Phyllis Cleveland and Joe Cimperman… Cleveland, council majority leader, noted that she had voted against the trans fat ban last year…
    “But I stand here in support of our mayor and our partners,” she said… We see our city power being attacked by Columbus… [O]ur right to govern ourselves is being eroded.”

  • Environmental Groups Call for Tougher Measures in Marcellus Shale Bills

    While the industry faces a significant challenge in meeting local land use controls, there are critical site or regional considerations that cannot be effectively addressed within a state statute. The state should not grant special preemption for any one industry in this regard.

  • Mayors’ group campaigns against concealed gun bill

    NEW YORK (AP) Monday, September 12, 2011; Seattle Post-Intelligencer Mayor Michael Bloomberg and other mayors in support of gun control are speaking out against a…

  • IOM Report: Revitalizing Law and Policy

    “[U]nless there are compelling reasons to the contrary, the federal government ought not preempt state and local authority in advancing the public’s health.”

Resources

› Fact sheet

› Glossary

› Links

› Preemption Checklist

› Building Movements

› Movement Benefits

› IOM Presentation